Sunday, July 13, 2008

the insomnia factor

Insomnia does strange things to the brain. The early hours of the morning can fly by at times; before I know it the entire night has flown by and it's six in the morning. Sometimes. Other times the night crawls by & the wee hours barely bother moving on trapping the sufferer in an external exoskeletal of pain, weariness & superhuman suffering. For some reason known only to God and a handful of scientists sworn to secrecy insomnia actually doesn't kill you. Just forces you to find random links such as this, this, and this. The point I'm trying to make or believe myself is that insomnia is in actual fact a virtual form of madness which isn't necessarily cured by sleep just as the experience of taking hard drugs isn't necessarily cured by not taking any more, or staying sober. And, as I'm sure we're very aware that all three of the above subjects; insomnia, drugs and 'madness' are all more or less inter-related when it comes to literature. Taking a broad view of craziness related issues myself I generally & wholeheartedly believe that to be on the fringes of society is madness. Simply put: why would you do that to yourself? Why stay on the outside when you know it's going to cause you so much bother? Why stay different in a world that will attempt to grind you down should it be determined that you are "different"?

Well, this brings me neatly to the first book I want to write about. The Eden Express by Mark Vonnegut. Mark has just written the introduction to his father's latest book Armageddon in Retrospect which has been posthumously published. The Eden Express was first published in 1975 was out of print for years and picked up again by Seven Stories Press in 2002. It's a non-fiction book about his dealings with schizophrenia; the title comes from his trying to unite the Outer and the Inner life so he can reach Eden while living in a Hippie commune in British Columbia. Schizophrenia brought him to it in record time. Mark is remarkably well-written both in his introduction to his father's work and his own memoir of schizophrenia. One of my favourite quotes from the Introduction is: "Anyone who thinks that Kurt's jokes or essays came easily or were written off the cuff hasn't tried to write." Eden Express itself is well-written with thoughtful and unpretentious prose. He attests his recovery to megavitamin therapy and the book is full of useful information on schizophrenia which, even if the reader is not directly or infirectly affected by the malady,  makes for comforting reading at that hour of the morning when your limbs are encased in sleep but you're still awake surfing the web. There's a particular sensitivity and rounded knowledge that he brings to his writing that doesn't always exist when the offspring of famous writers tend to take to the same craft. Fittingly enough Mark Vonnegut, who was named for Mark Twain, is a pediatrician which adds just the finishing sheen to the poetry of the relationship between father and son.

Moving swiftly along- the blue sky shines through my window every morning. How is it that in this city the very early morning is often spectacular to see whereas the rest of the day is usually grim and grey?

Ooh, this is a nice one. Certainly Orwell's strangest book. The Clergyman's Daughter. Dorothy Hare is devoted to her father, the titular clergyman. She looks after her patrician father and her household chores are all timed to the minute. The central theme is one of modern slavery, how various systems of control insinuate themselves into modern life. Dorothy's position within the parish is undoubtedly not of the lowest order yet her life is miserable. Here's the catch though: She is seen by the parish gossip kissing the most disreputable man in town, a certain Mr. Warburton, goes home to make costumes for a kids pageant or play and while the glue is melting on the stove, the heavy smell dulling her senses and kettle whistling, she falls asleep only to wake up on a beach having lost all memory of who she is. An event which remains both unquestioned and unexplained throughout the entire book! Now here's the thing, Orwell later repudiated the book dismissing it as tripe. Personally it's my favourite Orwell. Orwell was not a beautiful writer, he was a journo. He waged war on the cliché demanding that all clichés be henceforth dropped from the English language. Cliché was a 'tired worn boot' that needed to be cast off, which only went to prove that it is practically impossible to talk about clicés without using clichés. He was not an admirer of the aesthetically beautiful but an exposer of the intrisically socially ugly. 1984 is a big ol' brute of a book, painful to read in every way, which establishes O as being the English version of Dostoevsky, or, in other words, prepared to bludgeon the reader with meaning until, bloody and fainting, the reader submits that salvation is only possible through sweat, blood & tears. Dorothy works picking hops, is a beggar on Trafalgar Square finely portrayed through play format which suits the chaos of the action and she goes to teach in a school where she is immediately beset upon by the despicable mistress. I'll never forget Miss Strong, Dorothy's predessor whose legacy is empty bottles stashed around Dorothy's room. The whole work ends with Dorothy ending back in the parish at the kitchen table, glue melting on the stove &c. What I love about this book is that Dorothy is not by nature a bitter person, neither do her experiences change her for the worst. At times she is desperate for money, company and the recognition of society but her lifelong experience of being a subject at the hands of her father has made her naive. Each new situation that she finds herself in she accustoms herself to as a child not knowing anything better. Her helplessness is entirely in the mind of the reader and Dorothy's grace is entirely indebted to the fact that she always has been a slave. Perhaps Orwell disowned the book as it is one of few indications he actually had a creative imagination. Don't get me wrong, I love and respect Orwell in the same way I do Dostoevsky, but he called the shots as he saw them and his books are identifiable as being part of his life in a way that it is possible to set out chunks of his life through the representation of them in his books. In this way Dorothy is the black sheep of Orwell's lifelong oeuvre and that suits her & me just fine and dandy.

I'm going to eat soft-boiled eggs and marmite soldiers.





Posted by littlesnapper at 10:19:35 | Permanent Link | Comments (0) |

Wednesday, May 21, 2008

the cult and the awful..

I've decided this blog will be written two to three times weekly. There. I said it. I'm very busy trying to earn a living selling books and it takes me time to articulate & gather these thoughts of great profundity.

*

Some of my favourite books tend to be referred to as cult books. These books tend to be single books in the body of an authors work and are marked as being distinct from anything else the author has written. A one of a kind book that ticks all the boxes and is revered by smallish groups usually outside the mainstream audience of readers. For example. Terry Pratchett, Anna Kavan & Marian Keyes are cult authors. The body of their work appeals to the same audience and their books are easily recognisable as being part of their 'oeuvre'. I'll write more about them in a later post. Cult books are generally difficult to transpose into different mediums such as film, theatre, or godmercifulsaveus, the broadway musical because they isolate and highlight peculiarities of text and story that become their emblems. A few examples.

Perfume by Patrick Suskind: Brilliant book about evil incarnate that becomes a master of scent &the manipulation of the olfactory senses. You'll be fascinated by 18th century France and its surrounding atmosphere that faintly suggests parahuman conditions that can shape our lives and yet be invisible to us.  The laboratories that Grenouille
, the main character, uses are reminiscent of alchemy and they are, perhaps a little obviously, the means by which Grenouille transforms himself into a murderer. The translation is damn good. Writing which cuts clear and concise images and builds Grenouille from a freak into a figure worthy of lore. Made into a film in 2001 where the filmakers overcame the difficulty of showing scent by using colours. This was followed by the two novella's The Story of Mr Sommer, which is illustrated by Sempé & The Pigeon which wasn't so well received. Both gems in their own right but the subject matter is so dramatically redisguised in the slow-moving tales that they become almost parables and much more difficult to identify.

Day of the Jackal by Frederick Forsyth: Released as a film twice. Once in '73 with Edward Fox in a  decent faithful adaptation and once in '97 in a godawful modern adaptation with Richard Gere and Bruce Willis. The table of contents is divided into three parts;
1. Anatomy of a plot
2. Anatomy of a manhunt
3. Anatomy of a kill
which is exactly how the book unfolds. The narrative splits its time between the assassin's careful preparation for the kill & the mild-mannered detective who goes about his business of tracking down the Jackal and finding out more about him. The book is notable for the meticulous way in which it sets out the details of both men. The Jackal's manipulation of women and opportunists for a political cause is  shown in relief to the background of an initially sympathetic cause. The former soldiers that make up the OAS are seeking recognition from a government who isolated them and left them in a conflict zone by granting Algeria's independence. The Jackal's journey to Paris takes on the form of a revenge killing set up by a extinct political structure. In the end there is none of the usual 'good guy, bad guy' routine. Just an ending. Don't bother even trying to read anything else by Forsyth. It's all rubbish that reveals him to be a right-wing idiot who just hapened to fall on a brilliant story that fitted his technique. This one  though ticks all the boxes and will set the imagination afire.

Snow Crash by Neal Stephenson: This one is credited with the popularisation of such terms we use every day on the internet such as 'avatar', 'meta-verse', and the idea of internet shopping malls and high streets. What differentiates this cyber-punk novels from, say, William Gibson, is the intensity of the satire and high level of intertextuality from ancient Japanese and Greek texts to the present. Think 1950's pulp paperback Western with a Japanese twist in a probable future. Basically the world has been screwed so badly that we prefer living our lives jacked in to the interactive meta-reality of the web. Our avatars are created by us in a superb inference of wish fulfillment worthy of Joseph Campbell. That universe is threatened by the appearance of a drug which you take in the meta-verse called Snow Crash which does the obvious. Again, the writing is fast-paced, concise and clear. There's are good guys who go after the bad guys and then there are the oblivious. Sound familiar? The reason this one is a cult classic though is because of the immediate recognisability of the satire that easily bridges the uncomfortable gap between straight fiction and sci-fi. The intertextuality doesn't interfere with the easy reading of the book either but rather doesn't simply stop at the textual. The main character's name is 'Hiro Protagonist'! I won't spell it out. It's a great little book and although it was Stephenson's third novel he hasn't yet written another one quite like it that damn good & all his other books just fade in comparison.

*

And there are, of course others. But I'll keep them for another time. I've got to keep something to stuff up my sleeve, otherwise what would be the point?
Posted by littlesnapper at 00:30:12 | Permanent Link | Comments (0) |